{"id":51104,"date":"2016-06-08T17:17:44","date_gmt":"2016-06-08T17:17:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/?p=51104"},"modified":"2022-12-01T13:34:41","modified_gmt":"2022-12-01T18:34:41","slug":"the-war-on-drugs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/blogs\/the-war-on-drugs\/","title":{"rendered":"The War On Drugs"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Many people have concerns and often times questions about the efficacy of the \u201cwar\u201d on drugs. Some of the questions and issues revolve around is the current approach effective or how effective is the current approach. The other question that is often asked is the country taking the right approach does this country need a completely new approach to address the issue of drug and alcohol abuse<\/strong>. To date there has not been a clear cut response to this question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After listening on CBS News Program \u201c60 Minutes\u201c yesterday evening and the viewpoints of the current director, Michael Botticelli. I decided to do this and couple that information with my own experiences in an effort to combat the illegal use of drugs<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) was established in 1989 as a cabinet level office within the Executive Office of the President. ONDCP no longer enjoys that status being relegated to an office within the Executive Office. Reference<\/strong>: Article in the Christian Science Monitor dated March 16, 2009.<\/cite> <\/cite>\u201c<\/cite>For one thing, in the Obama administration the Drug Czar will not have Cabinet status, as the job did during George W. Bush\u2019s administration.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The first Director, William Bennett, set the approach for ONDCP and how it would operate. When ONDCP first started, the current thinking was to interdict drugs coming into this country. There was a massive network put into place to stop the flow of drugs from coming into the county thereby reducing the supply. In my view there was very little thought given to reducing the demand for drugs and nothing stated in the original plan about reducing the demand for drugs which, in turn, would reduce the supply of drugs. The other part of the policy was to incarcerate people who with drug convictions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When the military first started a program in 1982, there were positive rates going well above 30% for some military units. These rates have declined till they hover right about the 1% positive rate. This positive rate has been maintained since the late 1980s. Surveys of military personnel reveal that 26% of the respondents would use drugs on a casual or social use basis if it were not for random drug testing<\/strong><\/a>. This is a figure that speaks for itself. This is a statistic that has to catch the attention of key policy makers on the drug war.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It should be noted at the time that ONDCP was initiated, the Department of Transportation (DOT) drug testing program<\/strong><\/a> was started with those regulations published November 21, 1988. The effectiveness of the deterrent value of military random drug testing was already established with the military drug testing program by the time ONDCP was established and was a model for DOT established programs. The random testing rate for the military programs was between 125% up to 250%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The current debate over drug war policy centers around several different view points, including interdiction of incoming drugs, treatment, education and harm reduction. There has been very little mention made of the one effective tool that has worked time and time again. That tool is workplace drug testing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n