Step 8: Preparing transportation<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nYou do not want to allow someone you suspect of being under the influence behind the wheel of a car; therefore, you should ensure the employee does not have to drive to the testing center or back home afterward. Often employers will coordinate with a local cab company for these types of trips. The cab fees and tip should be paid by the employer. You will need to coordinate with the cab company or driver on whether they can bill you or have to pay upfront. It is a good idea to work out this type of arrangement in advance so that it is available when you need it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Step 9: Sending for testing<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nContact your drug test facility to notify it that you have an employee on the way for reasonable suspicion testing. Provide the employee with the number for the cab company to call after the testing to get a ride home. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Step 10: Waiting for results<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nThe employee needs to know what to do and expect tomorrow. Your company policy should address this, but if not, you want to set a consistent practice. In most cases, the employer does not want an employee to return to work until the test results are available. Employers are not obligated to pay a nonexempt employee for any time or days he or she must spend off work waiting for test results; however, you may be required to pay exempt employees for this time off work according to the Fair Labor Standards Act. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Step 11: Refusing the test<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nIf the employee refuses to go for the test, you should refer to your drug and alcohol policy. A policy may state that this will be treated as a positive drug test result OR will result in immediate termination of employment. If the employee refuses a cab and attempts to drive home, never<\/strong> attempt to physically restrain the employee. Take note of the employee\u2019s type of car and license plate and contact the authorities to report concern that the employee is driving under the influence. <\/p>\n\n\n\nStep 12: Results are negative<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nIf the drug or alcohol test results are negative, contact the employee and return him or her to prior job and work shift as soon as possible. Many employers will pay the employee for all work shifts and hours he or she missed while waiting for the negative test results (even if it is not required to be paid). <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Step 13: Results are positive<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nAgain, you must refer to your company policies and precedence. If you have an Employee Assistance Program, it is a good idea to provide contact information for this service regardless of whether you continue the individual\u2019s employment. Depending on your policy, you may offer a last-chance agreement<\/strong> allowing the employee to seek counseling and\/or treatment and return to work with the understanding that he or she will be terminated if under the influence at work again. An employer does have the option to terminate immediately for positive test results if this is your common practice, policy or precedence. You may wish to seek legal counsel on how to proceed. <\/p>\n\n\n\nExamples<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nScenario One:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nThe supervisor of a two-person department receives an e-mail from Mike (one employee) stating that he thinks Dave, the other employee in the department, is coming to work drunk. The e-mail states, \u201cOn Monday Dave smelled like a brewery.\u201d It is now Thursday. The supervisor talks with Mike to get more information, but there are no other witnesses due to the small department. The supervisor thanks Mike for coming forward with his concerns and asks Mike to let him know immediately if it happens again, and if he is not in the office, Mike should contact HR or the department head. The supervisor meets with Dave but observes no signs of Dave being under the influence at work. The supervisor talks with HR and the department head, and they agree that they cannot move forward with any testing based on one employee\u2019s complaint about a concern a few days old. The supervisor is asked to document the situation and provide it to HR so that they can maintain this in a separate investigation file for future reference. The supervisor will keep his eyes open, and decides to make a point to check in on Mike and Dave each morning and after lunch for the next week or so. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Scenario Two:<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\nThe shipping supervisor, Tim, was walking past Sandy in the packing department. Sandy stumbled into him. When Tim helped her up, he noticed her eyes were making some unusual movements, and she seemed confused and acted as if she didn\u2019t recognize Tim. Tim went back to his office and called in Sandy\u2019s supervisor, John. Tim asked if John had noticed anything odd about Sandy lately. John stated that Sandy had been very erratic; she was coming in late and she never seemed to be at her workstation when John walked through. He had written her up just last week for both issues, but admitted he hadn\u2019t talked to Sandy yet today. Tim relayed what he had observed. John asked Tim to report this to HR while he went looking for Sandy. When John found her, she was standing at her workstation but was not working \u2013 she was staring off in a daydream. When John asked her what she was working on, she didn\u2019t hear him at first, and then had a hard time focusing on him. Her eyes wouldn\u2019t hold steady, her pupils were dilated, and finally she started rambling on and on. John asked Sandy to walk with him to the conference room and remain there for a few minutes, he wanted to talk with her some more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
HR\u2019s office was across the hall and Tim was already reporting what he had observed. John filled HR in on his additional observations. HR asked John to document what he observed, and after review of all the information they agree to send Sandy for reasonable suspicion drug and alcohol testing. The HR person called the cab company to arrange transportation to the facility and printed out the drug testing consent form. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
John and the HR representative returned to the conference room to meet with Sandy. HR explained what had been observed today and stated that in order to rule out the possibility that Sandy had violated the company\u2019s drug and alcohol policy, they were going to send her for drug and alcohol testing. Sandy started crying and shaking her head. She balled up the drug test consent form and threw it in the trash and stood up to leave. The HR representative explained this was the only way to rule out the possibility of policy violation, but if Sandy refused to sign the consent form or go for testing it would be treated as a positive test and subject to immediate termination of employment. Sandy pushed past her supervisor and ran out the door. John followed Sandy into the parking lot, pleading, \u201cSandy, I don\u2019t want you to drive so upset. Listen, a cab should be here any minute. If you still don\u2019t want to go for testing when it arrives, then I will pay for the cab to take you home.\u201d Sandy drove away. HR had written down the license plate and called the police. Sandy was sent a termination letter in accordance with their drug testing policy. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Scenario Three:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nJane tells her manager that she suspects Joe (an accountant) had a few drinks at lunch. She had suspected Joe was drinking at lunch in the past, but this is the first time she smelled the alcohol on his breath. The manager asks Jane when she observed this and how, why she had suspected it before, if she observed any other concerning behaviors, and whether anyone else commented on this or witnessed this. The manager then approaches Joe\u2019s workstation and asks him a few questions about the project he is working on today. During this exchange, the manager observes the smell of alcohol when Joe speaks; also, his speech was slurred and he seemed distracted and flushed. The manager asks his lead to stop by Joe\u2019s desk to drop off some papers and chat with him. The manager asks the lead to let him know if he notices anything odd. The lead returns 10 minutes later and says that something was definitely off with Joe; he was talking slower and sounded like his words were slurred. His desk was a mess (very unusual for this accountant) and he was dropping papers and folders, and even bumped into his coffee cup (which thankfully was empty). They both document what they observed and call HR. HR reviews their observations, prints off a drug test consent form and a copy of the drug and alcohol policy, and agrees they should send Joe for reasonable suspicion testing according to their policy. The HR representative contacts the cab company and asks them to arrive in half an hour. Then they call Joe into a meeting with the manager and the HR representative. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
In the meeting, the manager explains what he had observed and the HR representative confirms that he can smell beverage alcohol on Joe\u2019s breath right now. The HR representative explains that in order to rule out the possibility that Joe violated the drug and alcohol policy, they were going to send him for testing. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
After Joe signs the consent form, the HR representative explains that he would take a cab to the testing facility and then the cab would take him home. It usually takes up to 48 hours to get the test results, and according to procedure Joe would be called back to work after the results come back. An employee with negative test results will be paid for the days missed waiting for the results. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Joe has a positive test result. The company procedure is to offer a last chance agreement to the employee, and Joe accepted this. The company mandatorily referred Joe to their EAP, and he signed the last chance agreement and will be putting in a request for FMLA leave for treatment. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
How to Document for Reasonable Suspicion in your Drug Free Workplace What do you do if you suspect an employee is under the influence of drugs or alcohol at work? This guide will walk you through the steps management should take to properly execute and document situations under a drug and alcohol testing policy. These […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":51804,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"57215,50975,51374,51067,51541,50986","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[46,47,78],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50894"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50894"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50894\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50894"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50894"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50894"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}