{"id":51053,"date":"2016-04-07T16:29:23","date_gmt":"2016-04-07T16:29:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/?p=51053"},"modified":"2021-02-09T15:18:50","modified_gmt":"2021-02-09T20:18:50","slug":"refusal-to-test-drugs-or-alcohol-dot-alcohol-drug-testing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/blogs\/refusal-to-test-drugs-or-alcohol-dot-alcohol-drug-testing\/","title":{"rendered":"REFUSAL TO TEST – DRUGS OR ALCOHOL – DOT & ALCOHOL DRUG TESTING"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

DER RESPONSIBILITIES<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Many times in the drug and alcohol testing process<\/a><\/strong>, the DER must make a determination of a refusal to test. This is often misunderstood. It is an extremely important responsibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What exactly is a refusal to test and who determines it?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The DOT regulations outline refusals to test for drugs and alcohol. Some refusals are determined by MROs<\/a><\/strong> and BATs and STTs. For others, the determination is\u00a0your\u00a0responsibility. All have clear instructions from DOT<\/strong><\/a>. You must base your decisions on these DOT instructions<\/strong><\/a> and\u00a0NOT\u00a0on personal opinions about whether the employee is a long-time reliable worker; has ever tested positive or refused a test; was correctly selected for the test; or claims to have misunderstood the collector\u2019s instructions to remain at a collection site, among others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the next page you will find a list of Part 40 refusals and the DOT regulation instructions for handling them.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

IMPORTANT NOTE:<\/strong> When a collector for a drug test, or an STT or BAT for an alcohol test, reports a refusal event to the DER, the EMPLOYEE MUST IMMEDIATELY BE REMOVED FROM SAFETY-SENSITIVE DUTIES, and after that you [or the DER] must verify if the employee actually refused the test based upon the documentation provided and DOT\u2019s instructions. When you [or the DER] determine that there is a refusal, do not return the employee to safety-sensitive duties until the SAP return-to-duty process is successfully completed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In extremely rare cases for which you [or the DER] determine there is not a refusal, you [or the DER] must document your decision and your solid reasoning for it. You must maintain this documentation for a DOT Agency or USCG representative in the event of an inquiry or inspection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Remember, your decision could be overturned by the DOT, a DOT Agency, or the USCG. So, as a safeguard to ensure that you make the correct determination, you ought to consult with your MRO<\/a><\/strong> on collection site refusals \u2013 the MRO<\/strong><\/a> is, after all, the \u2015Gatekeeper\u2016 for the drug testing process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NOTE:<\/strong>\u00a0An MRO\u2019s<\/strong><\/a> refusal determination is final and not subject to your review. Also, an evaluating physician\u2019s refusal determination for an employee\u2019s insufficient breath is final and not subject to your review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here\u2019s a list of Part 40 refusals and the DOT regulation instructions for handling them:<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Event<\/th>Decision Maker<\/th>DOT Instructions<\/th><\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Fail to appear at a urine collection site when directed to report<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the collector documentation]<\/td>\nIf the employee did not get to the site or spent too much time getting there, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to remain at the urine collection site<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the collector documentation]<\/td>\nIf the collector reports that the employee left the collection site before the testing process was complete, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to provide a urine specimen<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the collector documentation]<\/td>\nIf the collector reports that the employee left the collection site before providing a required specimen, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to permit a monitored or observed urine collection<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the collector documentation]<\/td>\nIf the employer ordered an observed collection or if the collector required the collection to be monitored or observed, it is a refusal if the employee does not<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to provide a sufficient amount of urine<\/td>\nMRO<\/td>\nIf the MRO finds that there was no medical reason for the employee to provide an insufficient amount of urine, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail or decline to take an additional drug test the employer or collector has directed<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the collector documentation]<\/td>\nIf the employer or collector directs the employee to take an additional test, as required or permitted by the DOT, and the employee does not, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to undergo a medical examination or evaluation the MRO or employer has directed<\/td>\nMRO<\/td>\nIf the employee does not go in for a medical evaluation or does not permit it to occur, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to cooperate with any part of the urine collection process<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the collector documentation]<\/td>\nSome examples of failure to cooperate are when the employee: 1. Refuses to empty pockets when directed; 2. Behaves in a confrontational manner that disrupts the<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
For an observed collection, fail to follow the instructions to raise and lower clothing and turn around<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the collector documentation]<\/td>\nIf the employee does not follow these instructions so that the observer can check for prosthetic or other devices that could be used to interfere with the<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Possess or wear a prosthetic or other device that could be used to interfere with the collection process<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the collector documentation]<\/td>\nIf the employee is found to have or wear a prosthetic or other device designed to carry clean urine or a urine substitute, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Admit to the collector to having adulterated or substituted the specimen<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the collector documentation]<\/td>\nIf the employee, during the collection process, admits to having tampered with his or her specimen, it is a refusal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Adulterate or substitute a urine specimen<\/td>\nMRO<\/td>\nIf the laboratory reports a confirmed adulterated or substituted specimen to the MRO and the MRO determines there is no medical reason for the result, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Admit to the MRO to having adulterated or substituted the specimen<\/td>\nMRO<\/td>\nIf the employee, during a medical review, admits to having tampered with his or her specimen, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to appear for an alcohol test when directed to report<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the STT or BAT documentation]<\/td>\nIf the employee did not get to the alcohol test site or spent too much time getting there, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to remain at the alcohol test site<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the STT or BAT documentation]<\/td>\nIf the STT or BAT reports that the employee left the collection site before the testing process was complete, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to provide an adequate amount of saliva or breath<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the STT or BAT documentation]<\/td>\nIf the STT or BAT reports that the employee left the alcohol testing site before providing a required amount of saliva or breath, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to provide a sufficient breath specimen<\/td>\nEvaluating Physician<\/td>\nIf the evaluating physician finds that there was no medical reason for the employee to provide an insufficient amount of breath, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to undergo a medical examination or evaluation as the employer has directed as part of the insufficient breath procedures<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER<\/td>\nIf the employee does not go in for a medical evaluation or does not permit it to occur, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to sign the certification statement at Step 2 of the ATF<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the STT or BAT documentation]<\/td>\nIf the employee does not agree to have a test accomplished by signing Step 2 of the ATF, it is a refusal.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fail to cooperate with any part of the alcohol testing process<\/td>\nEmployer \/ DER [after review of the STT or BAT documentation]<\/td>\nOne example of failing to cooperate is when the employee behaves in a confrontational manner that disrupts the alcohol testing process.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n\n\n\n Download PDF<\/a>\n\n\n\n

It is critical the DER take the time to understand the above scenarios that may cause a refusal to test and the DER take appropriate action. Failure to understand the refusals and not taking the appropriate action can lead to non-compliance with DOT regulations. It is also a safety issue for your employers and for the general public. A Designated Employer Representative (DER) should always seek training to properly perform the regulated duties that come with this position.
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

DER RESPONSIBILITIES Many times in the drug and alcohol testing process, the DER must make a determination of a refusal to test. This is often misunderstood. It is an extremely important responsibility. What exactly is a refusal to test and who determines it? The DOT regulations outline refusals to test for drugs and alcohol. Some […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":20638,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_seopress_robots_primary_cat":"none","_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"50935,51535,51391,51229,51160,50862","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51053"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51053"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51053\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20638"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nationaldrugscreening.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}